Were you one of those students who, despite your teachersâ warnings, continued to write in your books? If so, you have a lot of companyâsome of it illustrious (no pun intended). And now, there are a number of efforts going on around the world to capture these scribbled snippets of wisdom.
The notion of âmarginalia,â or making handwritten notes and drawings in the margins of book pages, dates back as far as the Middle Ages. Presumably, monks made random drawings and notes to relieve the tedium of the manuscripts they were copying. Once mechanical printing started, marginalia really took off as scholars of the day held debates with the books they were readingânot so different from comment sections on websites.
To the despair of librarians everywhere, marginalia has marched on. âSuch readers feel that they arenât really giving a book their full attention unless theyâre hovering over it with a pencil, poised to underline or annotate at the slightest provocation,â writes Mark OâConnell in the New Yorker, going on to quote George Steinerâs description of an intellectual as âa human being who has a pencil in his or her hand when reading a book.â Writers such as Jack Kerouac, Vladimir Nabokov, Samuel Beckett, Graham Greene, and Mark Twain were all noted for their habit of scribbling in books written by others.
These notes can still be useful to us today, say researchers. âThis diverse evidence of annotation provides a considerable range of unique and largely untapped research materials, which reveal that readersâmuch as users of the internet todayâadapted quickly to the technology of print: interacting intimately, dynamically, socially, and even virtually with texts,â writes Johns Hopkins University.
In fact, Johns Hopkins goes on to call marginalia âamong the largest, least accessible, and most underutilized of original manuscript sources from the early modern period, due to the fact that they are almost entirely uncatalogued, or undercatalogued, by major research collections throughout the world.â
Thatâs what marginalia digitization projects hope to change. Here are some examples:
The Archaeology of Reading in Early Modern Europe, a joint venture of Johns Hopkins, Princeton and University College London, will transcribe and catalog marginal notes in 16th- and 17th-century books held in various libraries. The project will begin with a number of heavily annotated books and expand from there, eventually producing a large, fully searchable dataset available on a publicly accessible website.
Annotated Books Online enables people to add transcriptions and translations and upload annotated books of their own, access to which is then provided free of charge to researchers. Thus far, it contains about 60 volumes, including Martin Lutherâs copy of the New Testament.
The Darwin Manuscripts Project, which currently offers “digital access to all of the 34,643 folios [of Darwin’s] that deal directly with the theory of evolution.” “Transcriptions are essential, as Darwinâs handwriting is often difficult to read, and having his marginalia, notes, and letters be legible can more readily support new research,” writes Allison Meier in Hyperallergenic. These include scribblings in books he studied, abstracts, book drafts, articles and their revisions, journals he read, and his notebooks on transmutation. âThere are even some charming oddities like drawings by Darwinâs children on the back of leaves of The Origin of Species,â Meier notes.
Digitizing Walt Whitmanâs Annotations and Marginalia is a project that has been going on at the University of Texas at Austin since 2007. âUsing Walt Whitmanâs manuscript marginaliaâhis annotations and other scribblings on other writersâ printed worksâwe have built prototype tools for marking up such documents as well as for displaying interactive search results for such documents using images and text,â notes the projectâs website.
Hidden in Plain View: Making Visible the Robbins Libraryâs Marginalia Collection is a project that began this summer to digitize the marginalia at Harvard Universityâs Robbins Library. âInterest in readersâ marginalia ranges across disciplinary bounds,â writes Eric Johnson-DeBaufre of Robbins Library of Philosophy. âMaking visible our collection of marginalia thus stands to benefit philosophers as well as historians, literary scholars, and others.â
As people progress to reading books electronically, does this mean the death of marginalia? Just the opposite, actually. Some marginalia aficionados see it as a new revolution, equivalent to that of Gutenberg. âImagine reading, say, Adventures of Huckleberry Finn and touching a virtual button so thatâping!âErnest Hemingwayâs marginalia instantly appears, or Ralph Ellisonâs, or Mary McCarthyâs. Or imagine youâre reading a particularly thorny passage of Paradise Lost and suddenlyâzwang!âup pops marginalia from a few centuries of poets (Blake, Coleridge, Keats, Emerson, Eliot, Pound), with their actual handwriting superimposed on the text in front of you,â writes self-confessed marginaliaist Sam Anderson in the New York Times. âThis, it seems to me, would be something like a readerly utopia.â